Plans, Takes, and Mis-takes

Authors

  • Nathaniel Klemp Department of Politics, Princeton University
  • Ray McDermott School of Education, Stanford University
  • Jason Raley Gevirtz Graduate School of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara
  • Matthew Thibeault School of Music, University of Illinois
  • Kimberly Powell College of Education and School of Visual Arts, The Pennsylvania State University
  • Daniel J. Levitin Department of Psychology and Schulich School of Music, McGill University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v10i1.1964

Keywords:

learning, action, activity, practgice, music, jazz,

Abstract

This paper analyzes what may have been a mistake by

pianist Thelonious Monk playing a jazz solo in 1958.

Even in a Monk composition designed for patterned

mayhem, a note can sound out of pattern. We reframe

the question of whether the note was a mistake and ask

instead about how Monk handles the problem. Amazingly,

he replays the note into a new pattern that resituates

its jarring effect in retrospect. The mistake, or

better, the

 

mis-take, was “saved” by subsequent notes.

Our analysis, supported by reflections from jazz musicians

and the philosopher John Dewey, encourages a

reformulation of plans, takes, and

 

mis-takes as categories

for the interpretation of contingency, surprise, and

repair in all human activities. A final section suggests

that mistakes are essential to the practical plying and

playing of knowledge into performances, particularly

those that highlight learning.

Downloads

Published

2008-04-26

How to Cite

Klemp, N., McDermott, R., Raley, J., Thibeault, M., Powell, K., & Levitin, D. J. (2008). Plans, Takes, and Mis-takes. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 10(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v10i1.1964

Issue

Section

Articles